Different Conflict-Resolution Strategies between Americans and Lebanese: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

dc.advisorGeorge Yanceyen_US
dc.collegethe teachers collegeen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaidar, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-11T19:44:48Z
dc.date.available2013-07-11T19:44:48Z
dc.date.createdMarch 1, 2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013-07-11
dc.departmentpsychologyen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, I investigated the differences between a Western and a Middle Eastern sample of employees in their supervisory conflict handling styles. I also examined employees’ intention for organizational exit, tenure, age and size of organization. Statistical findings validate that supervisory conflict is positively related to employee turnover intention and that integrative conflict management styles such as problem-solving and compromise are preferred over other strategies in both nations. Finally, this study also found a noticeable difference between the amount of conflict experienced by the two groups and their differing preferences for the use of “forcing” in concession. .en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3266
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectConflict-Resolution Strategiesen_US
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Comparisonsen_US
dc.subjectLebaneseen_US
dc.subjectAmericansen_US
dc.titleDifferent Conflict-Resolution Strategies between Americans and Lebanese: A Cross-Cultural Comparisonen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sarah Sleiman Haidar.pdf
Size:
551.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.35 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections